|
| |
“White Men and Allies: Deepening the
Partnership in Creating Inclusive Organizations”
Orlando, FL, 11/4/2001 through 11/7/2001
Purpose of the Conference:
The White Men and AlliesTM
workshop was a three and a half day residential learning lab designed for
organizational teams of two or more. Each team, consisting of a mixture of
white men, women and people of color, were to be intentionally formed so that,
upon return, they could work together as partners with their organization’s
ongoing diversity efforts. The purpose of the workshop is to have participants:
 |
Understand more about how systemic racism, sexism, heterosexism,
and classism operate as systemic advantage in their work, community and
personal life. |
 |
Become more conscious of how their own behavior may unintentionally
reinforce these unproductive dynamics. |
 |
Identify new options for interrupting systemic advantage, and for
being a more effective partner across difference at work and in other
interactions. |
General
Summary:
This workshop was
excellent for several reasons including that it used experiential learning
techniques rather than simple lecture/presentation style, it defined diversity
partnership types that help us to understand the level of our commitment to
diversity, provided tools that individual participants could use for developing
diversity partnerships, engaged the participants in defining diversity issues
and most importantly made it clear that “white heterosexual male” defines the
dominant, but by no means only, culture in the U.S. I rate the workshop a 9 out
of 10.
Executive
Summary:
 | What is White Male culture?
Seeing white male culture
is a challenge because it is pervasive in the U.S. It can be defined and is
clearly different than white female culture and the cultures of people of
color. These are the key attributes of the culture:
 | Rugged individualist.
We see ourselves not as
members of a group, but as individuals. By contrast, women and people of
color see us as members of a group and expect that we’ll behave consistently
with being in that group. |
 | Low tolerance for ambiguity |
 | Focus on status and rank over
connection. |
 |
Time is linear and future focused.
|
 |
Rational over emotional.
|
 |
Doing/task completion vs. being.
|
|
Notice that these cultural
attributes correlate strongly with those of Microsoft’s culture.
 | What is
“systemic advantage?” As defined by
the workshop participants: An unconscious, invisible agreement among those in
power (and those that collude with them) to get as much as possible or hold
what they already have, that provides unblocked access to benefits not
necessarily earned and unquestioned permission to do what members want,
reinforced by policies, rules, laws, etc., created by those in power. In the
U.S., white males have been the group in power since the beginning and thus
have defined this agreement and accrue the benefits. |
 | Diversity
Partnership types: There is a
natural evolution of partnerships around diversity issues. These are the
stages of partnership based on the type of commitment provided and the
duration of the work:
 |
Opportunity driven: Serves best
interests of individuals involved, has a time-limited common goal and is the
typical starting point for diversity partnerships. |
 |
Transactional: Also time-limited,
focused on a particular task and provides a routine service. Examples
include participating in newsletters, brown-bags, publicity and diversity
committees. Represents the second step for diversity partnerships. |
 |
Alliances: Longer-term cooperation
in service of common interests/cause and taking on more difficult
challenges. Examples include employee networks and ally partners (like the
planned participants of this workshop). |
 |
Synergistic/Leadership: Longer-term,
natural partnerships with mutual benefit that take bigger risks to tackle
systemic advantage and privilege. Both partners have clarity around
privileges and their impact. |
|
In my work environment, we can see that most of
the partnerships formed on the basis of our review goals are transactional.
Major
sponsors:
·
The workshop was created and
facilitated by White Men as Full Diversity Partners®
(WMFDP), an organizational-development
consulting firm. The workshop was lead by WMFDP facilitators Bill Proudman and
Jo Ann Morris.
Second
tier sponsors:
·
Florida Hospital (2 attendees,
several others planned but did not attend). Florida Hospital has strong
diversity leader, XXX, who appeared in some of the training videos during the
course of the workshop.
·
Ithaca University (2 attendees)
|